Nitin Ramesh Garajkar v. Megha Nitin Garajkar
Case at a glance
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Permission is granted. Appeal is, therefore, disposed of as withdrawn. [SMT. VAISHALI PATIL–JADHAV] JUDGE [NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI] JUDGE komal kamble
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 23 OF 2012 Nitin Ramesh Garajkar VERSUS Megha Nitin Garajkar … • Adv. Shritej Surve h/f. Mr. Surve Hemant, Advocate for Appellant … WITH FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 16 OF 2013 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14962 OF 2018 IN FCA/23/2012 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 15 OF 2013 IN FCA/16/2013 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4995 OF 2021 IN FCA/23/2012 … CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND SMT. VAISHALI PATIL–JADHAV, JJ. DATE : SEPTEMBER 29, 2025 PER COURT :
Learned advocate for the appellant has instructions to withdraw the appeal. Copy of letter dated 27.09.2025, addressed by the appellant to the learned advocate, is placed on record. Same is marked ‘X’ for identification.
Permission is granted. Appeal is, therefore, disposed of as withdrawn. [SMT. VAISHALI PATIL–JADHAV] JUDGE [NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI] JUDGE komal kamble
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.