MATILAL BABULAL MORE v. R.V.GAME & Anr.
Case at a glance
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. In view of compliance of order, contempt petition is disposed of. (VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV,J.) ( NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI,J.)
Judgment
Cause title
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,
BENCH AT AURANGABAD. 933 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 7 OF 2016
IN WP/4655/2014 MATILAL BABULAL MORE
VERSUS
R.V.GAME AND ANOTHER ... Advocate for the Petitioner :
Mr. Deshpande Ajay S. AGP for Respondent/State :
Smt. V.S. Chaudhari Advocate for Respondent no.1 : Mr. Patil Pravin S. ...
CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ. DATED : 4th NOVEMBER, 2025.
ORDER :
. Writ Petition filed by the petitioner was allowed in terms of prayer clauses “A” and “B”, which read thus :- "A. Writ Petition may kindly be allowed. B. The impugned show cause notice at Exh. `E' dated
29.1.2014/10.2.2014 issued by R-1 to the petitioner may kindly be quashed and set aside.
S.L.P. filed challenging this order was dismissed by the Apex Court on 29.06.2016. After dismissal of the S.L.P. the respondents have paid retiral benefits of the petitioner by order dated 5th October,
2017. In our view, therefore, the order passed by this Court is complied with.
Learned Advocate for the petitioner submitted that petitioner is entitled for interest on delayed payment of retiral benefits. If the petitioner is aggrieved by the delayed payment of retiral benefits, 2
7.2016CP.odt he is at liberty to seek interest by filing appropriate proceeding.
In view of compliance of order, contempt petition is disposed of. (VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV,J.)
( NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI,J.)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.