(Vinayak v. The State of Maharashtra, through School Education & Sports Department, and 4
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
The petition is dismissed, as
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. The petition is dismissed, as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for. (N.D. DESHPANDE) (A.P. DESHPANDE) JUDGE JUDGE bgp/wp7149
Judgment
.............................................................................. Mr. R.R. Suryawanshi, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. K.B. Chaudhary, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent nos.1 to 3. Respondent no.4 served ( Absent). Mr. D.J. Chaudhari and Mr. M.R. Chaudhari, Advocates, for respondent no.5. .............................................................................. CORAM : A.P. DESHPANDE & N.D. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATE : 9TH FEBRUARY 2010
The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to file fresh petition claiming arrears of salary against the management of the school. Permission granted. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders
Operative part
The petition is dismissed, as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for. (N.D. DESHPANDE) (A.P. DESHPANDE) JUDGE JUDGE bgp/wp7149
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The petition is dismissed, as
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 09 Feb 2010. The bench was N D DESHPANDE.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.