✦ Bombay High Court · 11 Sep 2009

Judgment · High Court · 2009

Writ Petition No. 6965 of 2008S S SHINDE

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

Petition is disposed of with following

Key paragraphs

  • Para 44. With the above direction, 3 the Writ Petition is disposed of. [ S.S.SHINDE ] JUDGE knp/WP6965.08

Judgment

Mr. C.K.Shinde , Advocate for Petitioner. Mr. V.S.Panpatte , Advocate for Respondent nos. 1 and 2. ........................... [ CORAM : S.S.SHINDE, J. ] DATE : 11/09/2009. PER COURT :

1.

This Writ Petition takes exception the Order dated 23/10/2008 passed by the Additional Collector, Aurangabad Division, Aurangabad Case No. DB/Appeal/Cell/56/2008.

2.

Counsels appearing for the 2 respective parties jointly submit that this Petition can be disposed of in terms of Order dated 15/6/2009 in Writ Petition N0. 6834 of 2008 and connected matters.

Operative part

3.

It is submitted by the counsel for the petitioner as well as respondent that the next date for final hearing of the appeals filed by the petitioners along with other appeals is fixed on 30/9/2009. The present Writ Petition is disposed of with following directions :

(i) The parties to maintain status-quo regards the post held by petitioner as on today till the final disposal of the petition filed before the Additional Commissioner, Aurangabad.

(ii) The Additional Commissioner to hear this appeal with other appeals on 30/9/2009 without any adjournment.

4.

With the above direction, 3 the Writ Petition is disposed of. [ S.S.SHINDE ] JUDGE knp/WP6965.08

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Petition is disposed of with following

Which court decided this case, and when?

Bombay High Court, on 11 Sep 2009. The bench was S S SHINDE.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 6965 of 2008). ← Search more judgments