Income Tax Appeal No. 466 of 2006 · High Court · 2008
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. Following the said judgment, the appeal is dismissed. [ BILAL NAZKI, J.] [ BILAL NAZKI, J.] [ BILAL NAZKI, J.] [ S.S.SHINDE, J.] [ S.S.SHINDE, J.] [ S.S.SHINDE, J.]
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.466 OF 2006. The Commissioner of Income-Tax-V. .. Appellant. Versus Versus Versus Vighnahar Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. .. Respondent. .... Mr.Vimal Gupta, for the Appellant. None present for the Respondent. .... CORAM : BILAL NAZKI & CORAM : BILAL NAZKI & CORAM : BILAL NAZKI & S.S. SHINDE, JJ. S.S. SHINDE, JJ. S.S. SHINDE, JJ. DATE : 4TH JULY, 2008. DATE : 4TH JULY, 2008. DATE : 4TH JULY, 2008. P.C. P.C.P.C.
The questions raised in the appeal are covered by the judgment of this Court in (2008) 301 ITR 191 (Bom.).
Following the said judgment, the appeal is dismissed. [ BILAL NAZKI, J.] [ BILAL NAZKI, J.] [ BILAL NAZKI, J.] [ S.S.SHINDE, J.] [ S.S.SHINDE, J.]
[ S.S.SHINDE, J.]
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 04 Jul 2008. The bench was S S SHINDE, BILAL NAZKI.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.