✦ Bombay High Court · 24 Sep 2012

Office Notes, Office v. SUDHAKAR VINAYAK KAREGAONKAR & Anr.

Ra No. 223 of 2012S S SHINDE

Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD ________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders ________________________________________________________ Court's or Judge's orders | | | | | CIVIL APPLICATION NO.8558 OF 2012 ,In RA/223/2012 THE STATE OF MAH AND ORS VERSUS SUDHAKAR VINAYAK KAREGAONKAR AND ANR ... AGP for Applicant: Smt. S.D. Shelke. Advocate for Respondents: Mr.Joshi H.A.for R/1. ... CORAM : R.M. BORDE & S.S. SHINDE, JJ. Dated: September 24, 2012 ... This is an application seeking condonation of delay in presenting review application. Heard respective Counsel for parties. For the reasons stated in the application, application deserves to be allowed and same is accordingly allowed. Delay stands condoned. (S.S. SHINDE, J) (R.M. BORDE, J) kadam/

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Ra No. 223 of 2012). ← Search more judgments