✦ Bombay High Court · 29 Aug 2022

BAPURAO RANGNATH PANCHAL v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Writ Petition No. 8825 of 2022INDRA V GHUGE ARUN R PEDNEKER2 min read

Judgment

... Advocate for the Petitioner : Shri Kulkarni Girish N. (Mardikar) AGP for the Respondents/State : Shri P.S. Patil ... CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE ARUN R. PEDNEKER, JJ. & DATE :- 29th August, 2022 Per Court :-

1.

The petitioner has put forth prayer clauses B and C as under:- C)

B) To issue writ of certiorari to quash and set aside impugned order/ communication dated 02.08.2021 (Exhibit D) issued by the respondent No.2 Education Officer, Secondary, Zilla Parishad, Parbhani. To issue writ of mandamus and direct respondent No.2 Education Officer Secondary Zilla Parishad Parbhani to decide the proposal for grant of approval to the services to the petitioner as Head Master of High School Omkareshwar Secondary and Higher Secondary High School, Tridhara (Kshetr), Tq. And Dist. Parbhani, within stipulated time and grant approval to services of the petitioner as *2* 45wp8825o22 Head Master and to grant consequential benefits to the petitioner, within stipulated time.

2.

The grievance of the petitioner is that he being the senior-most teacher in the school, should have been given the power to sign the salary bills and also should have been appointed as the Headmaster. A candidate, namely, Shri R.S.Kakde, who is at Sr.No.2, has been given the charge of signing the salary bills for the period 01.06.2021 till 30.11.2021. He is unofficially continuing on the same post.

3.

Neither the School, nor Shri Kakde have been arrayed as the respondents. We, therefore, cannot consider prayer clause B.

4.

The learned advocate for the petitioner submits, on instructions, that the representation at page 23 in which, he has requested the Education Officer to consider his candidature for the post of the Headmaster, dated 27.08.2021, is pending. He prays that the said representation may be considered by the Education Officer. He also desires to place additional documents before the Education Officer.

5.

In view of the above, this Writ Petition is disposed *3* 45wp8825o22 off.

6.

Let the Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Parbhani, deal with the representation of the petitioner dated 27.08.2021, on it’s own merits and by giving an opportunity of hearing to the Management as well as Shri R.S.Kakde and all other teachers, who may be stakeholders. The petitioner is also permitted to place additional documents before the Education Officer. Let such exercise be completed on or before 21.10.2022. kps (ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.)

(RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.)

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 8825 of 2022). ← Search more judgments