BABARAO VYANKATRAO CHANDANSHIVE v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & Ors.
Case at a glance
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. The petitioner is without such salary for 04 years and 11 months. The learned advocate for the petitioner submits that factually, he has not been paid his salary from 15.10.2015. *3* 907wp4812o22 In view of the above, this Writ Petition is disposed Since respondent…
Judgment
... Advocate for the Petitioner : Shri Rodge Krishna P. AGP for Respondents 1 to 3 : Shri S.G. Sangle Advocate for Respondent 5 : Ms.Yogita Thorat ... CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE ARUN R. PEDNEKER, JJ. & DATE :- 26th August, 2022 Per Court :-
:- The petitioner has put forth prayer clause B as under
B. By a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ or direction in the like nature, the order dated 10.11.2014 issued by the respondent no.5-Education Officer cancelling the approval dated 01.10.2013 to the post of Shikshan Sevak in the respondent no.6-School granted in favour of petitioner may kindly be quashed and set aside and the said approval dated 01.10.2013 to the post of Shikshan Sevak may kindly be restored.
We have considered the submissions of the learned *2* 907wp4812o22 counsel for the respective sides.
The learned advocate representing respondent No.5/ Education Officer (Primary), Zilla Parishad, Nanded, has vehemently opposed this petition. However, on instructions, she submits that a decision would be taken in the light of the directions issued by the Deputy Director of Education, Latur, dated 22.09.2017, to the Education Officers (Primary/Secondary) of the Latur Zilla Parishad, Nanded Zilla Parishad and Osmanabad Zilla Parishad, within a short period. She places on record the compilation received by her dated 25.08.2022 from respondent No.5, praying for four weeks time to take a decision and pass an order. The said communication (four pages) is taken on record and marked as “X” for identification.
The Deputy Director of Education had directed the Education Officers vide the letter dated 22.09.2017 by which, the payment of salaries of the employees, whose approval has been cancelled or suspended pending an enquiry, was to be resumed and they should be paid their salaries without further delay.
The petitioner is without such salary for 04 years and 11 months. The learned advocate for the petitioner submits that factually, he has not been paid his salary from 15.10.2015. *3* 907wp4812o22 In view of the above, this Writ Petition is disposed Since respondent No.5 has committed to consider
off.
the order of the Deputy Director of Education dated 22.09.2017 and will take a decision in the light of the same, we expect such exercise to be completed on or before 30.09.2022. kps (ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.)
(RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.