✦ Bombay High Court · 19 Jan 2012

Writ Petition No. 567 of 2012 · Bombay High Court

Writ Petition No. 567 of 2012S V GANGAPURWALA

Case at a glance

Key paragraphs

  • Para 22. Heard. Statement is made by Mr.K.B.Choudhari, learned counsel for the Respondents on instructions that final order U/s 7-C of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, is passed. The petitioner in the present Writ Petition is challenging the order passed on 6.1.2012.…

Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.567 OF 2012 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's orders Mr.M.M.Bhokarikar, advocate for the petitioner. Mr.K.B.Choudhari, advocate for Respondents. CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J. Date : 19.01.2012. PER COURT :

2.

Heard. Statement is made by Mr.K.B.Choudhari, learned counsel for the Respondents on instructions that final order U/s 7-C of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, is passed. The petitioner in the present Writ Petition is challenging the order passed on 6.1.2012. As final order is already passed, the petition becomes infructuous. The Writ Petition is disposed of as infructuous.

3.

Needless to state, the petitioner is at liberty to assail the final order passed U/s 7-C of the Employees' Provident Funds and 2 Miscellaneous Provisions Act, if so advised. (S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.) Dt.19.01.2012. asp/office/wp567.12 3

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 567 of 2012). ← Search more judgments