✦ Bombay High Court · 03 Dec 2010

Associated Cement Companies Ltd v. Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner & Ors.

ANOOP V MOHTA

Case at a glance

Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 346 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION (LODGING) NO. 2370 OF 2010 Associated Cement Companies Ltd. ....Petitioner. Vs. Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner & Ors. ....Respondents. And Associated Cement Staff Union. ....Applicant. Mr. Anupam Surve i/by M/s. Haresh Mehta & Co. for the Petitioner. None for the Respondents. CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATE : 3rd December, 2010 P.C.: The Applicant Union was not joined as a party to the Appeal which was dismissed, though the Applicant lodged a complaint with the Authority, that resulted into the passing of impugned order under the Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, and in view of the averments made in the Chamber summons, the Chamber Summons is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). However to add the Applicant as Respondent No.4 instead of 2 chsw346.10.sxw Respondent No.3. The Proposed amendment to join Regional Provident Fund Commissioner as a party is allowed. The Petitioner to take steps accordingly within two weeks. 2 The Chamber Summons is accordingly disposed of with no order as to costs.

(ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments