Dattatrya Patingrao Borse v. The State Of Maharashtra
Case at a glance
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. In Writ Petition No. 8877 of 2023, learned counsel appearing forthe petitioner seeks leave of this Court to delete Respondent No. 4 -Education Officer (Primary), Z.P., Ahmednagar, from the array of therespondents. Leave is granted. Respondent No. 4 is deleted from thearray of respondents…
Judgment
1014+1015+1016WRIT PETITION NO. 9904 OF 2023 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 9892 OF 2023 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 5646 OF 2023 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 8877 OF 2023 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 9930 OF 2023…AND / WITH1016 WRIT PETITION NO. 14405 OF 2023 Janabai Jaysingh ChavanVERSUSThe State Of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary And Others________________________________________________________________•Adv. Majit Shaikh for the Petitioners in WP/8548/2022 andWP/200/2019•Adv. Mahesh Deshmukh a/w. Adv. K. D. Pote h/f. Adv. A. G.Ambetkar for the Petitioners in other matters•Mr. A. R. Kale, AGP for the Respondent(s) - State•Adv. S. M. Zaware for Respondent - Z.P., Ahmednagar•Adv. A. N. Sabnis for Respondent - Z.P., Ahmednagar inWP/8877/2023________________________________________________________________CORAM :ARUN R. PEDNEKER ANDVAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ.DATE :18.02.2026P E R C O U R T :
Kept for orders.
In Writ Petition No. 8877 of 2023, learned counsel appearing forthe petitioner seeks leave of this Court to delete Respondent No. 4 -Education Officer (Primary), Z.P., Ahmednagar, from the array of therespondents. Leave is granted. Respondent No. 4 is deleted from thearray of respondents at the risk of the petitioner. [VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J.] [ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.]ksk/ 2/2
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.