✦ Bombay High Court

Shri v. Vasantrao

Income Tax Appeal No. 523 of 2006R S MOHITE, F I REBELLO

Case at a glance

Key paragraphs

  • Para 11. We perused learned tribunal present appeal filed. The learned Tribunal considering contentions argued behalf appellant pleased reasonable failure comply provisions Section-269SS 269T within meaning Section 273B accordingly confirmed order of the CIT(A) cancelling the penalties levied u/s. 271D and 271E of the Act.

Judgment

Shri. Sahakari Pat Sanstha Ltd. Vs. Vasantrao Chougule Nagari .. Respondent. Mr. Mr.S.N.Inamdar Vimal Gupta Mr.A.K. Jasani Appellant. Respondent. CORAM DATED : F.I. : REBELLO 12TH & R.S. MOHITE, JANUARY, JJ. 2009. : PC

1.

We perused learned tribunal present appeal filed. The learned Tribunal considering contentions argued behalf appellant pleased reasonable failure comply provisions Section-269SS 269T within meaning Section 273B accordingly confirmed order of the CIT(A) cancelling the penalties levied u/s. 271D and 271E of the Act.

2.

Having learned counsel, clearly opinion conclusion arrived learned tribunal cannot unreasonable, considering contentions advanced before material record. Once case, question of law as framed would not arise and consequently appeal dismissed. ( R.S. MOHITE, J.)

( F.I.REBELLO, J.)

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Income Tax Appeal No. 523 of 2006). ← Search more judgments