Union of India & Ors. v. Medha D. Damle
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1357 OF 2007 Union of India and Ors. ... Petitioners Versus Medha D. Damle ... Respondents Mr. R.V. Desai, Sr. Counsel with Mr. H.V. Mehta and Mr. H.K. Vardhan and Leena Patel for Petitioners. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO, & CORAM: F.I. REBELLO, & CORAM: F.I. REBELLO, & R.S. MOHITE, JJ. R.S. MOHITE, JJ. R.S. MOHITE, JJ. DATED: DECEMBER 01, 2008 DATED: DECEMBER 01, 2008 DATED: DECEMBER 01, 2008 P.C. P.C.P.C. . The matter not on board. With the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, matter taken on board and heard forthwith. The issue involved in this petition is similar to that was in issue in W.P. No.1356 of 2007. . In the light of the above, nothing survives in this petition which is accordingly disposed of. (R.S. MOHITE, J.) (R.S. MOHITE, J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (R.S. MOHITE, J.)
(F.I. REBELLO,J.)
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 01 Dec 2008. The bench was R S MOHITE, F I REBELLO.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.