✦ Bombay High Court · 14 Feb 2005

Shakuntala Atmaram Deshmukh v. The Collector, Thane & Ors.

Writ Petition No. 7229 of 2004F I REBELLO, S P KUKDAY

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELATE CIVIL JURISDICTION APPELATE CIVIL JURISDICTION APPELATE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.7229 OF 2004 WRIT PETITION NO.7229 OF 2004 WRIT PETITION NO.7229 OF 2004 Shakuntala Atmaram Deshmukh ..Petitioner Vs. The Collector, Thane and Others ..Respondents ----- Mr.S.D.Patil for Petitioner Mr.C.R.Sonawane, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos.1 to 3 CORAM: F.I. REBELLO & CORAM: F.I. REBELLO & CORAM: F.I. REBELLO & S.P. KUKDAY, JJ. S.P. KUKDAY, JJ. S.P. KUKDAY, JJ. DATE: 14TH FEBRUARY, 2005. DATE: 14TH FEBRUARY, 2005. DATE: 14TH FEBRUARY, 2005. P.C. P.C.P.C. . Petitioner claims to be the owner of the land and according to her Respondent no.4 is in illegal occupation. There is no material before this Court to show that the petitioner is the owner of the property. Considering that the petition raises disputed questions of fact, this is not a fit case for this Court to exercise its extra ordinary jurisdiction. . It will be open to the petitioner if so advised to file proceedings before Civil Court or any other competent authority for declaration of their right to the property and if they succeed then to seek reliefs as per law. . With the above observations petition stands disposed of. No order as to costs. (F.I.REBELLO,J.) (F.I.REBELLO,J.) (F.I.REBELLO,J.) 222 (S.P. KUKDAY,J.) (S.P. KUKDAY,J.)

(S.P. KUKDAY,J.)

Questions this judgment answers

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Bombay High Court, on 14 Feb 2005. The bench was F I REBELLO, S P KUKDAY.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 7229 of 2004). ← Search more judgments