✦ Bombay High Court · 22 Feb 2011

The Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai City-4 v. M/s. Gupta Equities Pvt. Ltd

Case at a glance

Outcome

Dismissed

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to

Key paragraphs

  • Para 11. Counsel for the revenue fairly states that the questions raised in this appeal are covered by the decision of the Apex Court in the case of Techno Shares and Stocks Ltd. V/s. Commissioner of Income Tax reported in [2010] 327 I.T.R. 323 (SC) and…

Judgment

Mr. Vimal Gupta i/b. Ram Upadhyay for appellant. None for respondent. CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ. DATED : 22ND FEBRUARY, 2011 P.C. :-

#1. Counsel for the revenue fairly states that the questions raised in this appeal are covered by the decision of the Apex Court in the case of Techno Shares and Stocks Ltd. V/s. Commissioner of Income Tax reported in [2010] 327 I.T.R. 323 (SC) and the decision of this Court in Income Tax Appeal (Lod) No.1915 of 2007 [The Commissioner of Income Tax V/s. M/s. Star Chemicals (Bombay) P. Ltd.] decided on 27/2/2008. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. (MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to

Which court decided this case, and when?

Bombay High Court, on 22 Feb 2011. The bench was ADHAR, MRIDULA BHATKAR, P DEVADHAR.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments