M/s.V.M. Traders v. Union of India & Ors.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Allowed
The writ petition is allowed to be withdrawn
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. The writ petition is allowed to be withdrawn and the same is dismissed as such. (DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) 2 (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.10 OF 2006 M/s.V.M. Traders .. Petitioner. V/s. Union of India & Others .. Respondents. Ms.Indu Prashant i/b. H.R. Shetty & Co. for the petitioner. Mr.Y.S. Bhate with Mr.Y.R. Mishra for the respondents. CORAM : DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM : DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM : DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 12TH JANUARY, 2006. DATED : 12TH JANUARY, 2006. DATED : 12TH JANUARY, 2006. P.C. : Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents.
The learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner is going to file an appeal against the order dated 30th November, 2005 before the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals). In view thereof, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw this petition.
Operative part
The writ petition is allowed to be withdrawn and the same is dismissed as such. (DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) 2
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The writ petition is allowed to be withdrawn
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 12 Jan 2006. The bench was S RADHAKRISHNAN, P DEVADHAR.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.