Ashok Babulal Chouhan v. The Commissioner of Income Tax & Ors.
Judgment
Mr.M.K.Kulkarni for the applicant. Mr.A.S.Rao for the respondents. CORAM: S.RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM: S.RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM: S.RADHAKRISHNAN & J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED: 8TH FEBRUARY, 2005. DATED: 8TH FEBRUARY, 2005. DATED: 8TH FEBRUARY, 2005. P.C. :- P.C. :- P.C. :-
#1. Rule. Rule returnable forthwith.
#2. The learned counsel for the respondents waives service.
#3. Heard the learned counsel for the applicant and the respondents.
#4. By this Civil Application, the applicant is seeking recall of our order dated 25/1/2005 of dismissal of Writ Petition No.146 of 2005 wherein the petition was dismissed in default. Perused the application. There is no case of inaction, negligence and want of bonafide on the part of the applicant. Civil Application is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a) & (b).
#5. The above Writ Petition be placed on board for admission on 22nd February, 2005. (S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.