The Commissioner of Income Tax-7 v. M/s. Navneet Publications (India) Ltd
Case at a glance
Key paragraphs
- Para 11. Learned counsel for the appellant states that the questions raised in this appeal is covered against the revenue and in favour of the assessee by the decision of this Court in Income Tax Appeal No.3036 of 2010 [Associated Capsules Pvt. Ltd. V/s. Dy. Commissioner…
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2811 OF 2010 The Commissioner of Income Tax-7 ..Appellant. V/s. M/s. Navneet Publications (India) Ltd. ..Respondent. Mr. Suresh Kumar for appellant. Dr. K. Shivram with A.C. Singh for respondent. CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ. DATED : 22ND FEBRUARY, 2011 P.C. :-
#1. Learned counsel for the appellant states that the questions raised in this appeal is covered against the revenue and in favour of the assessee by the decision of this Court in Income Tax Appeal No.3036 of 2010 [Associated Capsules Pvt. Ltd. V/s. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr.] decided on 10/01/2011. In this view of the matter, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. (MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.