Parikh Enterprises & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
thereof, Petition is dismissed for want of prosecution
Key paragraphs
- Para 11. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. The learned Counsel for the Petitioners states that there are no instructions from the Petitioners. In view thereof, Petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. (V.C.DAGA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
Judgment
Ms.Priyanka Patil i/by M/s.Desai, Berjis & Chinoy for the Petitioners. Mr.P.S.Jetley i/by Mr.H.P.Chaturvedi for Respondents. CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, & CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, & CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, & V.C.DAGA, JJ. V.C.DAGA, JJ. V.C.DAGA, JJ. ATE : 6th June, 2007. ATE : 6th June, 2007. ATE : 6th June, 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.:
#1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. The learned Counsel for the Petitioners states that there are no instructions from the Petitioners. In view thereof, Petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. (V.C.DAGA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.