NO. 5388 OF 2006 . PETITION NO. 5388 OF Abdul Ahad Narvel v. Saher Abdul Narvel
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
Heard learned Counsel for the rival parties. Perused petition. Having heard Shri Govilkar at length, one observe Court a material available record. The reasonable possible view. Since Court exercising appellate jurisdiction, Court cannot substitute findings impugned order. No perversity demonstrated petitioner. No entertain petition. Petition is, therefore, dismissed limine. However, hearing of the substantive proceeding is expedited. No order as to costs. (V.C.DAGA,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.)
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 04 Sep 2006. The bench was V C DAGA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.