Writ Petition No. 3165 of 2009 · Bombay High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
writ petition is disposed of
Judgment
Operative part
Mr.Clifford Marties, for the petitioner. Mr.Y.M.Nakhawa, APP, for the respondent- State. CORAM: D.B.BHOSALE AND A.R.JOSH, JJ. DATE : 05/05/2010 PC: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. In this writ petition, the petitioner is seeking direction to respondent no.2 to register an offence against the persons named in the complaint dated 5.9.2009 (Exh A-1 to the writ petition) and to investigate the alleged offence. Learned APP, on instructions, submits that on receipt of the written complaints made by the petitioner dated 5.9.2009 (Exhibits A-1 and C to the petition), the PSI from Mahim police station visited the residence of the petitioner at Pune but 2 she was not available. He further submits that they also made attempt to call the petitioner at Mahim police station for recording her statement. He submits that the Mahim police station is prepared to record statement inquire/investigate the alleged offence and proceed in accordance with law. In view of the submissions made by the learned APP, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is prepared to visit the Mahim police station within a period of ten days from today. His statement is accepted. If the petitioner, as aforestated, visits the Mahim police station, the police will record her statement on the very same day and proceed further in accordance with law. With these observations, the writ petition is disposed of. Authenticated copy of this order be made available to the parties. (A.R.JOSHI,J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) 3
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.