✦ Bombay High Court · 04 Nov 2004

Akbar Abdul Karim Shaikh & Anr. v. Taboot-Inam Endowment Trust & Ors.

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

The petition is disposed of

Key paragraphs

  • Para 22. Mr.Tapkir, learned counsel for respondent no.2-bank states that Kisan Vikas Patras of Rs.35 Lacs will not be liquidated or encashed till the disposal of the main application No.9 of 2004 pending before the Maharashtra Wakf Tribunal, Aurangabad and for a period of 15 days…

Judgment

Mr.S.B.Bhandari with Mrs. Suman Jain for the petitioners. Mr.Vilas B.Tapkir for respondent no.2. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATED : 4TH NOVEMBER, 2004 DATED : 4TH NOVEMBER, 2004 DATED : 4TH NOVEMBER, 2004 P.C.: . Heard Mr.Bhandari, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr.Tapkir, learned counsel for respondent no.2

#2. Mr.Tapkir, learned counsel for respondent no.2-bank states that Kisan Vikas Patras of Rs.35 Lacs will not be liquidated or encashed till the disposal of the main application No.9 of 2004 pending before the Maharashtra Wakf Tribunal, Aurangabad and for a period of 15 days from the date of its disposal. His statement is accepted. In view of the statement made by Mr.Tapkir, learned counsel for respondent no.2, Mr.Bhandari, learned counsel for the petitioners states that he is not 2 2 2 pressing this writ petition. The learned counsel appearing for the parties jointly requested to give directions to the tribunal to dispose of the application within time frame. After having considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties I am satisfied that the following order shall meet the ends of justice: . The Maharashtra Wakf Tribunal, Aurangabad shall endeavour to dispose of application No.9 of 2004 as expeditiously as possible and preferrably within a period of four months from the date of receipt of this order. The petitioners to communicate this order to the tribunal within four weeks from today. . The petition is disposed of. (D.B.Bhosale, J.) (D.B.Bhosale, J.) (D.B.Bhosale, J.)

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: The petition is disposed of

Which court decided this case, and when?

Bombay High Court, on 04 Nov 2004. The bench was D B BHOSALE.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 8554 of 2004). ← Search more judgments