Civil Application No. 4089 of 2008 · Bombay High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Allowed
Delay condoned and the application is allowed in
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. Delay condoned and the application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (b) & (c). K.DESHPANDE, J) (RAVI K.DESHPANDE, J) (RAVI K.DESHPANDE, J) (RAVI (B.H.MARLAPALLE,J.) (B.H.MARLAPALLE,J.) (B.H.MARLAPALLE,J.)
Judgment
INININ THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4089 OF 2008 FIRST APPEAL (st) NO. 23882 OF 2007 IN The State of Maharashtra v/s. Hanuman Vilas Keni D/H- Anjana Hanuman Keni & ors. ...Applicants ...Respondents Mrs. G.P.Mulekar, AGP for the applicant Mr. Sachin Punde, Advocate for Respondents 1/1 to 1/4, 2 to 5, 6/1 to 6/5. : B.H.MARLAPALLE & CORAM : B.H.MARLAPALLE & CORAM CORAM : B.H.MARLAPALLE & RAVI K.DESHPANDE, JJ. K.DESHPANDE, JJ. RAVI RAVI K.DESHPANDE, JJ. APRIL 01, 2009 01, 2009 APRIL APRIL 01, 2009 P.C. . Heard Mrs. Mulekar, the learned AGP. Mr. Punde appears for the respondents.
Operative part
Delay condoned and the application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (b) & (c). K.DESHPANDE, J) (RAVI K.DESHPANDE, J) (RAVI K.DESHPANDE, J) (RAVI (B.H.MARLAPALLE,J.) (B.H.MARLAPALLE,J.)
(B.H.MARLAPALLE,J.)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.