Yusuf B. Patel v. State of Maharashtra & Anr.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
The application is disposed off in terms of
Provisions considered
Judgment
Mr.J.P.Shah for applicant. Ms.S.V.Gajare, APP for State. CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE, J. October 17, 2007. P.C. . Heard the larned counsel for the applicant - accused Criminal Case No.1859/SS/2005. The applicant compounding Section 147 However, Negotiable Instruments Act,
#1881. application submitted before Court and, therefore, prayer cannot be considered by this Court at the first instance. . If the applicant files an application under Section 147 Negotiable Instruments Act 2 compounding C.C. No.1859/SS/2005 within a period today, decided on its own merits as expeditiously as possible and preferably by 31st January 2008. . The application is disposed off in terms of the above directions. (B.H.MARLAPALLE,J.)
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The application is disposed off in terms of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — s. 147.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 31 Jan 2008. The bench was B H MARLAPALLE.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.