✦ Bombay High Court · 28 Apr 2010

Writ Petition No. 2946 of 2009 · Bombay High Court

Writ Petition No. 2946 of 2009D B BHOSALE, A R JOSH

Case at a glance

Order date
28 Apr 2010
Bench
D B BHOSALE, A R JOSH

Outcome

Disposed of

The writ petition is disposed of as

Judgment

Operative part

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2946 OF 2009 Court's or Judge's orders. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Mr.Nitin Pradhan, Advocate i/b Ms for the Ameeta Kuttikrishnan, petitioner. Mrs. A.S.Pai, APP, for the respondent- State. CORAM: D.B.BHOSALE AND A.R.JOSH, JJ. DATE : 28/04/2010 PC: Heard Mr Pradhan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mrs Pai, learned APP for the State. Mr Pradhan, learned counsel for the petitioner, prays for withdrawal of this writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to take appropriate legal action/steps for redressal of his grievance before the appropriate forum. The writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed. While granting liberty, we 2 shall not be understood to have examined the merits of the case. (A.R.JOSHI,J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) 3

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: The writ petition is disposed of as

Which court decided this case, and when?

Bombay High Court, on 28 Apr 2010. The bench was D B BHOSALE, A R JOSH.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 2946 of 2009). ← Search more judgments