Harish Ramratan Gaud v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Judgment
Operative part
Mr.D.G. Khamkar for the Petitioner Dr.F.R. Shaikh, APP for the Respondent-State CORAM : J.N. PATEL AND A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATE : 15TH DECEMBER, 2009. P.C. 1 Learned Counsel for the petitioner informed the Court that since the petitioner has already been released from the prison, the petition has become infructuous and therefore, he may be allowed to withdraw the petition. We accept the statement made by the learned Counsel for the petitioner and permit the petitioner to withdraw the petition. 2 Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. A.A. SAYED J. J.N. PATEL, J. 2
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 15 Dec 2009. The bench was A A SAYED, N PATEL.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.