Digambar Khandu Bhirud v. The Education Officer, Secondary & Ors.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
Subject to what is stated above, the petition is disposed of
Judgment
Operative part
Mr. N.N. Gavankar, instructed by Mr. Arfan Sait for the petitioner. Ms. Aparna Vhatkar, AGP, for the respondents. A.A. SAYED , JJ. CORAM: P.B. MAJMUDAR & P.C. DATE: FEBRUARY 24, 2011. The grievance of the petitioner is that the management i.e. Respondent No.2 has passed a resolution appointing the petitioner as the Headmaster of the said school for which approval has been sought for by respondent No.2 but the same has not been decided by the Education Officer (Secondary). In our view, the petition was required to be filed by the management and not by the teacher. However, we direct the Education Officer (Secondary) that in case any approval application has been submitted by respondent No.2, the same may be decided in accordance with law expeditiously and preferably within a period of three months from today. Subject to what is stated above, the petition is disposed of. P. B. MAJMUDAR, J. A.A. SAYED, J.
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Subject to what is stated above, the petition is disposed of
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 24 Feb 2011. The bench was P B MAJMUDAR, A A SAYED.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.