WRITWRIT v. The Municipal Corporation of city
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. This Court had already taken a view that the dispute relating to the Slum Rehabilitation Scheme under the Slum Rehabilitation Act has to be adjudicated before specially constituted Tribunal. The learned Counsel for the petitioners submitted :2: that the petitioners have approached the Tribunal…
Judgment
Mr.R.S. Datar for the petitioners Mr.R.S.Apte for respondent No.1 Mr. K.K. Malpathak for respondent No.2 Mr. V.P. Malvankar, AGP for respondent No.3 CORAM : J.N.PATEL AND : J.N.PATEL AND CORAM CORAM : J.N.PATEL AND A.A. SAYED, JJ. SAYED, JJ. A.A.A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATE : 7Th APRIL, 2008 : 7Th APRIL, 2008 DATEDATE : 7Th APRIL, 2008 P.C.
Heard the learned Counsel for the parties.
We propose to dispose of the petition at the stage of admission itself.
This Court had already taken a view that the dispute relating to the Slum Rehabilitation Scheme under the Slum Rehabilitation Act has to be adjudicated before specially constituted Tribunal. The learned Counsel for the petitioners submitted :2: that the petitioners have approached the Tribunal which has not taken any decision in the matter. We expect the Tribunal to take a decision in the matter within a period of four weeks from the date of passing of this order. Needless to say that the Committee would also deal with the issue as to whether Tribunals are to be constituted for the State of Maharashtra or for the areas affected which are within the limits of Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay for MCGM. We dispose of this petition accordingly. The order be communicated to the Commissioner of Municipal Corporation. (J.N.PATEL, J.) J.) J.) (J.N.PATEL, (J.N.PATEL, ((( A.A. SAYED, J.) A.A. SAYED, J.) A.A. SAYED, J.)
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Slum Rehabilitation Act.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 07 Apr 2008. The bench was N PATEL, A A SAYED, A A A A SAYED.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.