✦ Bombay High Court

Ors v. W.P.6096/12 : Dilip Vaman Kulkarni

Writ Petition No. 6092 of 2012D Y CHANDRACHUD, R D DHANUKA

Case at a glance

Bench: D Y CHANDRACHUD, R D DHANUKA

Judgment

Mr.Ajay A.Joshi for the Petitioners. Mr.A.B.Vagyani, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 to 3, 7 and 8. ..... CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD AND R.D.DHANUKA, JJ. July 19, 2012. P.C. : Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioners and the Learned AGP state that the facts of these Petitions are similar to those of Writ Petition 6091 of 2012 which has been disposed of VBC 2/2 wp6092.12-19.7 today. The present petitions shall accordingly stand disposed of in terms of the same directions. There shall be no order as to costs. ( Dr.D.Y.Chandrachud, J.) ( R.D. Dhanuka, J. )

Find similar cases Start drafting free

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 6092 of 2012). ← Search more judgments

Judgment

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

Related cases why they’re linked — not procedural history

Continue researching