M/s.Chandan Granite v. The State of Maharashtra & Anr.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
Petitions shall stand disposed of in the same terms
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Key paragraphs
- Para 11. O.S. Writ Petition No. 347 of 2012 decided on 30 April 2012 5 wp-826-2012 group Article 226 of the Constitution is not warranted at this stage. The Petitions shall stand disposed of in the same terms. No order as to costs. (DR.D.Y. CHANDRACHUD,J.) (R.D.DHANUKA…
Judgment
Mr.Gagandeep Maan, Proprietor of M/s.Mahavir Enterprises and M/s.Amrit Enterprises ...Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra & ors. ...Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.833 OF 2012 M/s.Chandan Marbles ...Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra & ors. ...Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.888 OF 2012 M/s.Giriraj Enterprises ...Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra & ors. ...Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.1957 OF 2012 M/s. Shree Balaji Steel ...Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra & ors. ...Respondents 3 wp-826-2012 group WITH WRIT PETITION NO.1958 OF 2012 M/s.Vishal Mega Paperex ...Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra & ors. ...Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.2016 OF 2012 M/s.Penrex Products ...Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra & ors. ...Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.2930 OF 2012 M/s.Manav Ispat Industries ...Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra & ors. ...Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.2931 OF 2012 M/s.Rajesh Trading Corporation ...Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra & ors. ...Respondents 4 wp-826-2012 group WITH WRIT PETITION NO.3119 OF 2012 M/s.Modi Steel Traders ...Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra & ors. ...Respondents Mr.Ratan Kumar Samal for petitioners in all the petitions. Mr.Darius J. Khambatta, Advocate General with Mr.E.P. Bharucha, Senior Advocate, Mr.D.A.Nalavade, Government Pleader, Mr.Vinay A. Sonpal, A-Panel Counsel, Mr.B.B.Sharma, AGP, Ms.Naira Jejeebhoy and Mr.S.E.Bharucha for respondents. CORAM: DR.D.Y. CHANDRACHUD & R.D.DHANUKA, JJ. April 30, 2012. P.C. Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the Advocate General appearing on behalf of the State submit that this petition would be governed by the judgment delivered today in M/s. Premium Paper and Board Industries Ltd. Vs. The Joint Commissioner of Sales Tax1. For the reasons already indicated by the Court in the judgment delivered in the companion writ petition, the exercise of the writ jurisdiction under
Operative part
O.S. Writ Petition No. 347 of 2012 decided on 30 April 2012 5 wp-826-2012 group Article 226 of the Constitution is not warranted at this stage. The Petitions shall stand disposed of in the same terms. No order as to costs. (DR.D.Y. CHANDRACHUD,J.)
(R.D.DHANUKA, J.)
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Petitions shall stand disposed of in the same terms
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 30 Apr 2012. The bench was D Y CHANDRACHUD, R D DHANUKA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.