Civil Application No. 95 of 2012 · Bombay High Court
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPLICATION NO.95 OF 2012 IN PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.90 OF 2012 ...Petitioner. ...Respondents. Nitin Shankar Deshpande. Vs. The President of India & Ors. .... Mr.Ashish N.Mehta for the Petitioner. Mr.Janak Dwarkadas, Senior Advocate with Mr.M.S.Karnik for Respondent Nos.1 to 4. Dr.Virendra Tulzapurkar, Senior Advocate with Mr.N.V. Walawalkar, Senior Advocate and Mr.Vikrant Walawalkar i/b. Mr.P.S.Dani for Respondent No.5. Mr.V.A.Thorat, Senior Advocate with Mr.P.K.Dhakephalkar, Senior Advocate i/b. Mr.P.J. Thorat for Respondent No.6. Mr.Aspi Chinoy, Senior Advocate with Mr.Zaal Andhyarujina, Mr.Farid Karachiwala and Mr.Bhavik Manek i/b. Wadia Ghandy & Co. for Respondent No.7. Mr.Amit Borkar with Mr.Akshay P.Shinde for Respondent No.8. Mr.Srihari Aney, Senior Advocate with Mr.Vineet Naik and Ms.Deepa Ahuja for Respondent No.9. Mr.Syed Ejaz Abbas Naqvi for Intervenor Samajwadi Legal Sabha (Cell). ..... CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD AND R.D.DHANUKA, JJ. July 2, 2012. P.C. : The Civil Application is for amendment of the Public Interest Litigation which is pending admission. The Civil VBC 2 cai95.12-2.7 Application is not opposed. The Civil Application is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). ( Dr.D.Y.Chandrachud, J.) ( R.D.Dhanuka, J.)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.