✦ Bombay High Court

Manohar Ramchandra Pevekar v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

Writ Petition No. 1780 of 2005V G PALSHIKAR R C R C R C CHAVAN, CHAVAN

Case at a glance

Bench
V G PALSHIKAR R C R C R C CHAVAN, CHAVAN

Outcome

Disposed of

petition is disposed of

Key paragraphs

  • Para 11. In petitioner remedy applying before Family joined dispute vacating impugned petition, reason interfere. Reserving that right to the petitioner, the petition is disposed of. ...

Judgment

Shri P.B.Kakade for the petitioner. Mrs. P.H.Kantharia APP for State. ..... .... CORAM ; V.G.PALSHIKAR ; V.G.PALSHIKAR &&& CORAM CORAM ; V.G.PALSHIKAR R.C.R.C.R.C. CHAVAN, JJ. CHAVAN, JJ. CHAVAN, JJ. DATED; 8TH AUGUST, 2005. 8TH AUGUST, 2005. DATED; DATED; 8TH AUGUST, 2005. P.C.; P.C.; P.C.;

Operative part

1.

In petitioner remedy applying before Family joined dispute vacating impugned petition, reason interfere. Reserving that right to the petitioner, the petition is disposed of. ...

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 1780 of 2005). ← Search more judgments