Mukesh D. Chandjain v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Case at a glance
- Bench
- CHAVAN
Provisions considered
Judgment
Mr.A.K. Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. D.R. More, APP for the State. CORAM:V.G. PALSHIKAR AND R.C.
11.7.2005 CHAVAN, JJ. PC: In view of the fact that adequate efficacious alternate remedy to file criminal complaint under Criminal Procedure Code is available, reserving that liberty to the petitioner, petition is allowed to be withdrawn.
11.7.05
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.
This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record.
Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on
Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 1699 of 2005).
← Search more judgments