IN HARISHCHANDRA CHANGO THOMBARE v. The State of Maharashtra
Case at a glance
- Bench
- R C R C R C CHAVAN, CHAVAN, V G PALSHIKAR, R C CHAVAN
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. Application for bail is rejected. J.) (V.G.PALSHIKAR, J.) J.) (V.G.PALSHIKAR, (V.G.PALSHIKAR, CHAVAN, J.) (R.C. CHAVAN, J.) (R.C. CHAVAN, J.) (R.C.
Judgment
Mr. A.P. Mundergi i.b. Mr. P.P. Runwal for the applicant. Mr. R.S. Khadapkar, APP for the State. CORAM: V.G. PALSHIKAR V.G. PALSHIKAR CORAM: CORAM: V.G. PALSHIKAR &&& R.C.R.C.R.C. CHAVAN, JJ. CHAVAN, JJ. CHAVAN, JJ. DATEDATEDATE : 18h July, 2005 : 18h July, 2005 : 18h July, 2005 P.C.:
1.
Looking circumstances applicant released on bail during trial, we see no reason to interfere. :2:
2.
Application for bail is rejected. J.) (V.G.PALSHIKAR, J.) J.) (V.G.PALSHIKAR, (V.G.PALSHIKAR, CHAVAN, J.) (R.C. CHAVAN, J.) (R.C. CHAVAN, J.) (R.C.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.
This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record.
Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on
Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Criminal Application No. 4318 of 2005).
← Search more judgments