✦ Bombay High Court · 01 Sep 2004

Mrs. Sulakshana Rajeev Khadapkar v. Technological Research, Mumbai. )

Judgment

M.P.Vashi & Associates for petitioner. Mr. Madhav Jamdar for Respondents 1 and 2. ..... ..... CORAM ; V.G.PALSHIKAR ; V.G.PALSHIKAR &&& CORAM CORAM ; V.G.PALSHIKAR MRS.MRS.MRS. RANJANA DESAI, JJ. RANJANA DESAI, JJ. RANJANA DESAI, JJ. DATED; 1st September, 2004. 1st September, 2004. DATED; DATED; 1st September, 2004. By petition, petitioner challenged transfer passed respondent Jawaharlal Institute Education, Science P.C.; P.C.; P.C.; 1. Nehru Technologyical Research. The transfer humanitarian ground stayed Rule granted. The therefore stayed January 2002 thereabouts. By reason petitioner continued function earlier functioning without obeying transfer order. In circumstances, adequate protection has been granted to the petitioner. The petition is therefore dismissed. .....

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Civil Petition No. 34 of 2002). ← Search more judgments