✦ Bombay High Court · 11 Jul 2008

O. O. C. J v. Sajjan Kumar Jajodia

Judgment

Mr. Parag Vyas i/b Mr. Pankaj Kapoor for the Appellant. None for the Respondent. .... .... CORAM: SMT. RANJANA DESAI & DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, JJ. 11th July 2008. P.C. : This Notice of Motion is taken out praying for condonation of delay in filing the instant Appeal. There is 124 days in filing the appeal. The Respondent has been served. However, nobody is representing the Respondent. We have heard counsel appearing for the Appellant. We have perused the affidavit in support of the Motion. For the reasons stated in the affidavit in support of the Motion, the delay is condoned. The Motion is disposed of. (SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J.) (DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.)

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments