Iqbal Ibrahim Mukadam & Ors. v. The Collector, Ratnagiri & Ors.
Case at a glance
Key paragraphs
- Para 11. Shri Nargolkar respondent, states petition is rendered infructuous. It is disposed of as such. (V.G. PALSHIKAR) (MRS. RANJANA DESAI) ....
Judgment
Shri N.D. Bhatkar for the petitioner - absent. Shri S.R. Nargolkar AGP for the Respondent. ..... ..... CORAM ; V.G.PALSHIKAR ; V.G.PALSHIKAR &&& CORAM CORAM ; V.G.PALSHIKAR MRS.MRS.MRS. RANJANA DESAI, JJ. RANJANA DESAI, JJ. RANJANA DESAI, JJ. DATED; 10TH AUGUST, 2004. 10TH AUGUST, 2004. DATED; DATED; 10TH AUGUST, 2004. P.C.; P.C.; P.C.;
#1. Shri Nargolkar respondent, states petition is rendered infructuous. It is disposed of as such. (V.G. PALSHIKAR) (MRS. RANJANA DESAI) ....
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.
This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record.
Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on
Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Civil Petition No. 3411 of 1995).
← Search more judgments