Hanumant Pandurang Aatlar v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
petition is dismissed
Provisions considered
- Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 s. 2(a)
Key paragraphs
- Para 11. In petitioner specific remedy section 2(a) Industrial Disputes Act, reserving remedy petitioner, petition is dismissed. All contentions shall remain available to the petitioner. ....
Judgment
Shri K.R. Jagdale for the petitioner. ..... ..... CORAM ; V.G.PALSHIKAR ; V.G.PALSHIKAR &&& CORAM CORAM ; V.G.PALSHIKAR MRS.MRS.MRS. RANJANA DESAI, JJ. RANJANA DESAI, JJ. RANJANA DESAI, JJ. DATED; 27TH AUGUST, 2004. 27TH AUGUST, 2004. DATED; DATED; 27TH AUGUST, 2004. P.C.; P.C.; P.C.;
#1. In petitioner specific remedy section 2(a) Industrial Disputes Act, reserving remedy petitioner, petition is dismissed. All contentions shall remain available to the petitioner. ....
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: petition is dismissed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 — s. 2(a).
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 27 Aug 2004. The bench was V G PALSHIKAR MRS MRS MRS RANJANA DESAI, RANJANA DESAI.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.