Sanstha Ichalkaranji v. The Collector, Kolhapur
Judgment
Shri P.S. Dani for the petitioner. Shri S.R.Nargolkar AGP for State. ..... ..... CORAM ; V.G.PALSHIKAR ; V.G.PALSHIKAR &&& CORAM CORAM ; V.G.PALSHIKAR MRS.MRS.MRS. RANJANA DESAI, JJ. RANJANA DESAI, JJ. RANJANA DESAI, JJ. DATED; 27TH AUGUST, 2004. 27TH AUGUST, 2004. DATED; DATED; 27TH AUGUST, 2004. P.C.; P.C.; P.C.;
#1. In petitioner claiming preferncial a Government Resolution relation certain Government contracts, writ for enforcement of such right cannot be maintained. Hence petition dismissed. ....
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.
This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record.
Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on
Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Civil Petition No. 6555 of 2004).
← Search more judgments