Judgment · High Court · 2012
Case at a glance
Key paragraphs
- Para 11. The petition is filed to challenge the order made by the Sessions Court. The JMFC has forfeited the cash security and this order is confirmed by the Sessions Court. Both the orders are reasoned orders. As nobody is present for the petitioner, the petition…
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1322 OF 2009 Shri. Sayeed Ahmed. versus …Petitioner.
1. The Commissioner of Customs & Anr. ...Respondents --- None for Petitioner. None for Respondent no.1. Mr.S.A.Shaikh, APP for State. --- CORAM : T.V.NALAWADE, J. DATED : 9th July, 2012 P.C. :
The petition is filed to challenge the order made by the Sessions Court. The JMFC has forfeited the cash security and this order is confirmed by the Sessions Court. Both the orders are reasoned orders. As nobody is present for the petitioner, the petition which is kept for final hearing is dismissed.
(T.V.NALAWADE, J.)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.