Amol v. The State of Maharashtra
Judgment
Shri M.B.Ubale h/f Shri L.K.Pradhan, Advocate for petitioner Shri K.J.Ghute Patil, AGP for Respondent-State. Shri D.V.Soman, Adv.for Respondent no.3 Shri S.M.Kulkarni, Adv.for respondent no4. .... CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL AND T.V.NALAWADE, JJ. DATE : 7th OCTOBER 2011 PER COURT 1] Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. By consent of parties, Petition is heard finally. 2] The petitioner seeks correction of date of birth in the Secondary School Certificate which was mentioned as “ THIRTY FIRST * BAD DATE * NINETEEN EIGHTY NINE “. The learned counsel Shri Soman submits that the petitioner has approached at a belated stage after about 3 years for seeking correction. 2 3] We have considered the submissions, perused the record placed before us. In the facts of the case we direct respondent no.3 to pass appropriate order in respect of correction of the date of birth as appearing in the certificate after going through the record and if necessary, after hearing the petitioner. The decision shall be taken by respondent no.3 within 6 weeks from today. The petitioner shall appear before respondent no.3 on 13th October 2011 at 11 a.m. Rule is made absolute in above terms. No costs. (T.V.NALAWADE,J. ) (NARESH H. PATIL,J. ) umg/wp2858-11
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.