Sharnappa Sangappa Parmashetti & Anr. v. Digamber Dattatraya Kelkunde & Ors.
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL RIVISION APPLICATION NO. 462 OF 2009 Sharnappa Sangappa Parmashetti & Anr. . ...Applicants. Vs. Digamber Dattatraya Kelkunde & Ors. ...Respondents. ---- Ms. G.P. Mulekar, for the Applicants. None for the Respondents. ---- CORAM: K.K. TATED, J. DATE : 5 th FEBRUARY, 2010 P.C.:
#1. Mrs. Mulekar, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicants states that as per order dated 21.1.2010 passed by this Court (Coram: Mrs. Nishita Mhatre,J), till date the applicant has not received the certified copy of the impugned judgment and order from the office of this Court. She therefore submits that the registry be directed to return the same. She further seeks to extend status quo order be continued for further period of four weeks. 2
#2. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, status quo order to continue for further period of three weeks. The registry is directed to return certified copy of the impugned judgment. (K.K. TATED,J.)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.