Through Shri. Ganesh Golatkar v. Sanjay Sharma & Ors.
Case at a glance
- Order date
- 12 Apr 2012
- Bench
- K K TATED
Outcome
Dismissed
Therefore, the Civil Application is dismissed as not
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Therefore, the Civil Application is dismissed as not pressed. (K. K. TATED, J.) S. S. MORMARE 1 of 1
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 381 OF 2012 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 37 OF 2012 Lucky House Bhadut Mandal Through Shri. Ganesh Golatkar Versus ....Applicant. Sanjay Sharma and others ....Respondents. ____________ Mr. Sanjay Bhatia for the Applicant. Shri. Dharam & Co., for the Respondent No. 1 and 2. Mr. Vinod Mahadik for the Respondent No. 3. CORAM: K. K. TATED, J. DATED : APRIL 12, 2012. P.C.: parties. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Applicant makes a statement that applicant is not pressing this application.
Operative part
Therefore, the Civil Application is dismissed as not pressed. (K. K. TATED, J.) S. S. MORMARE 1 of 1
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Therefore, the Civil Application is dismissed as not
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 12 Apr 2012. The bench was K K TATED.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.