Antoneta Caitan Fernandes v. Mumbai Municipal Corporation
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
The Civil Application is disposed of accordingly
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. The Civil Application is disposed of accordingly. (K. K. TATED, J.) S. S. MORMARE 2 of 2
Judgment
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 26 OF 2012 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST.) NO. 96 OF 2012 Antoneta Caitan Fernandes Versus ....Applicant. Mumbai Municipal Corporation ....Respondent. ____________ Mrs. Rekha Safari for the Applicant. Mr. Vinod Mahadik for the Respondent-BMC. CORAM: K. K. TATED, J. DATED : APRIL 12, 2012. P.C.: parties. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
This Application is preferred by the original Plaintiff for condonation of 2 days delay in filing the Appeal against the judgment and decree dated 1st November, 2011 passed by the Bombay City Civil Court at Bombay in L. C. Suit No. 4193 of 2007.
The learned counsel appearing on behalf of Respondent, vehemently, opposed the present Civil Application. He submits that the Applicant has not shown sufficient cause for S. S. MORMARE 1 of 2 2
11.caf.26.12 condonation of 2 days delay.
Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Applicant and the averments made in the Civil Application, I am satisfied that the Applicant has made out a case for allowing the present application. The Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a), which reads thus: “(a) That this Hon'ble Court be pleased to condone the delay of 2 days in filing the present Appeal and the same my be heard and disposed on merits..”
Operative part
The Civil Application is disposed of accordingly. (K. K. TATED, J.) S. S. MORMARE 2 of 2
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The Civil Application is disposed of accordingly
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 12 Apr 2012. The bench was K K TATED.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.