Rafiq Gafur Pathan v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Case at a glance
Key paragraphs
- Para 11. Since petitioner appointment compassionate ground, passage amount possibly has acrued to the petitioner, the petition is dismissed. ....
Judgment
Shri Umesh Mankaphre for the petitioner. ..... ..... CORAM ; V.G.PALSHIKAR ; V.G.PALSHIKAR &&& CORAM CORAM ; V.G.PALSHIKAR MRS.MRS.MRS. RANJANA DESAI, JJ. RANJANA DESAI, JJ. RANJANA DESAI, JJ. DATED; 23RD AUGUST, 2004. 23RD AUGUST, 2004. DATED; DATED; 23RD AUGUST, 2004. P.C.; P.C.; P.C.;
#1. Since petitioner appointment compassionate ground, passage amount possibly has acrued to the petitioner, the petition is dismissed. ....
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.
This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record.
Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on
Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Civil Petition No. 6273 of 2004).
← Search more judgments