Rakshak & General Kamgar Union v. Thane District & Ors.
Judgment
Shri S.S. Pakle for the petitioner. Mss. Lundi with Mrs. Lata S. Desai for the Respondent. ..... ..... CORAM ; V.G.PALSHIKAR ; V.G.PALSHIKAR &&& CORAM CORAM ; V.G.PALSHIKAR MRS.MRS.MRS. RANJANA DESAI, JJ. RANJANA DESAI, JJ. RANJANA DESAI, JJ. DATED; 23RD AUGUST, 2004. 23RD AUGUST, 2004. DATED; DATED; 23RD AUGUST, 2004. P.C.; P.C.; P.C.; 1. Heard the learned counsel for petitioners and Respondents.
#2. The involved petition covered decision in W.P.No. 1538 2001 (Maharashtra Suraksha Rakshad Aghadi Vs. The Security Buards Board for Gr. Bombay and Thane and ors.) decided on 5th February 2003.
#3. Mr. Pakale learned counsel appearing petitioners stated concerned security guards Board registration within today. The decide application within receipt thereof and allot the concerned security guards as per Board’s sceheme.
#4. Petition accordingly disposed of.
#5. Parties to act on an authenticated copy of this order. ....
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.