Sau.Babitai Balasaheb Shinde v. The State of Maharashtra None & Anr.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
the petition stands dismissed
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. As nobody is present, in view of the aforesaid circumstances, the petition stands dismissed. (T.V.NALAWADE, J.)
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.933 OF 2009 Sau. Babitai Balasaheb Shinde. versus
1. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. None for Petitioner. Mr.S.A.Shaikh, APP for State. --- …Petitioner. ...Respondents --- CORAM : T.V.NALAWADE, J. DATED : 9th July, 2012 P.C. :
Nobody present for the petitioner. This petition is filed challenging the order of the Sessions Court. The application was moved by the present petitioner in a private complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, for return of complaint/rejection of complaint on the ground of want of jurisdiction. The application is rejected by J.M.F.C. and this order is confirmed by the Sessions Court. The Court has observed that it is a matter of evidence and only after recording of evidence this point can be decided.
Operative part
As nobody is present, in view of the aforesaid circumstances, the petition stands dismissed.
(T.V.NALAWADE, J.)
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: the petition stands dismissed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — s. 138.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 09 Jul 2012. The bench was T V NALAWADE.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.