✦ Bombay High Court · 23 Aug 2004

Pandurang Chandrakant Khopatkar v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.

Case at a glance

Outcome

Dismissed

Petition is dismissed

Key paragraphs

  • Para 22. While making denying certificate petitioner, reasons authority concerned. This aspect entire evidence produced petitioner considered Caste Scrutiny Committee careful appreciation re-appreciation evidence conclusion concures finding recorded issuing authority therefore appeal dismissed. Relying a judgment court, contended learned counsel petitioner matter should certificate certificate issuing…

Judgment

Caste Scrutiny Committee upholding passed Sub Divisional Officer rejecting the petitioner’s application for grant of caste certificate.

#2. While making denying certificate petitioner, reasons authority concerned. This aspect entire evidence produced petitioner considered Caste Scrutiny Committee careful appreciation re-appreciation evidence conclusion concures finding recorded issuing authority therefore appeal dismissed. Relying a judgment court, contended learned counsel petitioner matter should certificate certificate issuing authority issued should scrutinised Caste Scrutiny Committee observations therein. The directions issued judgment applicable present case. In application rejected rejection upheld appellate authority. There adequate consideration material before appellate committee. Merely because certificate certificate documents documents reasons stated, cannot a ground setting appellate order. It established principle appellate authority concures original authority, reasons concurrent required stated further findings required given. Hence there is no substance in this petition. Petition is dismissed. C.C. expedited. ....

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Petition is dismissed

Which court decided this case, and when?

Bombay High Court, on 23 Aug 2004. The bench was V G PALSHIKAR MRS MRS MRS RANJANA DESAI, RANJANA DESAI.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Civil Petition No. 5397 of 2004). ← Search more judgments