Maharashtra Suraksha Rakshad Aghadi v. Bombay and Thane District & Ors.
Judgment
Smt. Ranjana Todankar for the petitioner. Shri Vaibhav Sugdare i/b M/s. S.Mohamedbhai & Co. for Respondent no.2 Ms. Lata Desai for Respondent no.1. ..... CORAM ; V.G.PALSHIKAR ; V.G.PALSHIKAR &&& CORAM CORAM ; V.G.PALSHIKAR MRS.MRS.MRS. RANJANA DESAI, JJ. RANJANA DESAI, JJ. RANJANA DESAI, JJ. DATED; 31ST AUGUST, 2004. 31ST AUGUST, 2004. DATED; DATED; 31ST AUGUST, 2004. P.C.; P.C.; P.C.;
#1. This petition conveniently disposed requesting the Board to take appropriate action as early as possible.
#2. Parties to act on an authenticated copy of this order. ....
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.
This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record.
Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on
Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Civil Petition No. 9324 of 2003).
← Search more judgments