✦ Bombay High Court · 23 Aug 2004

NO. 583 OF 200 PETITION NO. 583 OF 200 Amol D. Mahajan & Ors. v. Nuclear Power Corporation of India Ltd & Anr.

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Judgment

Shri V.P. Vaidya for the petitioner Shri Atul Damle for Respondent no.1 -union of India. Shri C.U.Singh with Ms. Lapa Manim i[b Shri Rajesh Kothari & Co. for the Respondent no.2. ..... CORAM ; V.G.PALSHIKAR ; V.G.PALSHIKAR &&& CORAM CORAM ; V.G.PALSHIKAR MRS.MRS.MRS. RANJANA DESAI, JJ. RANJANA DESAI, JJ. RANJANA DESAI, JJ. DATED; 23RD AUGUST, 2004. 23RD AUGUST, 2004. DATED; DATED; 23RD AUGUST, 2004. P.C.; P.C.; P.C.;

#1. This petition conveniently disposed requiring petitioner approach Government making reference dispute Industrial Disputes Act

#1957. If application is made within period 30 receipt a order, Government decide application within a period of 90 days thereafter in accordance with the law. The petition accordinaly disposed of.

#2. Parties to act on an authenticated copy of this order. ....

Questions this judgment answers

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Bombay High Court, on 23 Aug 2004. The bench was V G PALSHIKAR MRS MRS MRS RANJANA DESAI, RANJANA DESAI.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Civil Petition No. 583 of 2002). ← Search more judgments